diff --git a/_posts/2019-06-18-free-will.md b/_posts/2019-06-18-free-will.md
index 96721b9..cfec11c 100644
--- a/_posts/2019-06-18-free-will.md
+++ b/_posts/2019-06-18-free-will.md
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ A critique of a world of objectivity sheds more light on the consequences of acc
 
 Whether that’s a world we want to live in or not is debatable. This notion becomes concrete when we begin to search for answers to the following question.
 
-### Do Our Affiliations With Either Side Of The Debate Impact How We Bahave?
+### Do Our Affiliations With Either Side Of The Debate Impact How We Behave?
 
 A [fascinating social experiment](https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/91974.pdf){: style="text-decoration:underline"}<sup>[6]</sup> was conducted within this paradigm by Kathleen D. Vohs and Jonathan W. Schooler. A group of people (Group A) were made to read anti-free will texts and another Group B were handed pro-free will texts. After this conditioning, the two groups were asked to give a test with the possibility of cheating to score higher and the amount of pilfering was quantified. As observed in the outcome, participants cheated more frequently on a simple arithmetic task after reading an essay that refuted the notion of free will than after reading a neutral one. This correlation persisted in another experiment, in which cheating involved active efforts from the participant. These findings suggested that the loss of accountability by believing in determinism had a marked impact on the actions of these individuals. Determinists were also observed to be [less punitive](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14765562){: style="text-decoration:underline"}<sup>[7]</sup> to deviant conduct than staunch proponents of free-will, though some studies claim otherwise.