*** empty log message ***

This commit is contained in:
Søren Sandmann Pedersen
2005-09-04 23:40:53 +00:00
parent 22d05ac014
commit 6e37d7848c

23
TODO
View File

@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Before 1.0:
- Announce on Advogato
- Announce on gnome-announce
- Announce on kernel list.
- Send to slashdot/developers
- Announce on devtools list (?)
Before 1.2:
@ -228,6 +229,12 @@ http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Embedded/LSB-Embedded/ehframe.html
dump the data to a network socket. Should be able to react to eg.
SIGUSR1 by dumping the data.
Work done by Lorenzo:
http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/software/gnome-startup/sysprof-text.diff
http://www.colitti.com/lorenzo/software/gnome-startup/sysprof.log
http://colitti.com/lorenzo/software/gnome-startup/
- Figure out how Google's pprof script works. Then add real call graph
drawing. (google's script is really simple; uses dot from graphviz).
@ -237,6 +244,7 @@ http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/booksets/LSB-Embedded/LSB-Embedded/ehframe.html
(g_file_replace())
- somehow get access to VSEnterprise profiler and see how it works.
somehow get access to vtune and see how it works.
Later:
@ -248,6 +256,11 @@ Later:
and you will need to insert the module from the command line]
- Applications should be able to say "start profiling", "stop profiling"
so that you can limit the profiling to specific areas.
Idea:
Add a new kernel interface that applications uses to say
begin/end.
Then add a timeline where you can mark interesting regions,
for example those that applications have marked interesting.
- Find out how to hack around gtk+ bug causing multiple double clicks
to get eaten.
@ -306,7 +319,7 @@ Later:
Having that would also take care of the "multiple functions"
above. Noone would understand it, though.
- figure out a way to deal with both disk and CPU. Need to make sure that
things that are UNINTERRUPTIBLE while there are RUNNING tasks are not
considered bad.
@ -347,10 +360,10 @@ Later:
been read will stay in cache (for short profile runs you can assume that with disk,
but not for long ones).
- Perhaps show a timeline with CPU in one color and disk in one color. Allow people to
look at at subintervals of this timeline.
look at at subintervals of this timeline. Is it useful to look at both CPU and disk at
the same time? Probably not. See also marker discussion above. UI should probably allow
double clicking on a marked section and all instances of that one would be marked.
- The existing sysprof visualization is not terribly bad, the "self" column is
more useful now.
@ -361,6 +374,7 @@ Later:
- Optimization usecases:
- A lot of stuff is read synchronously, but it is possible to read it asynchronously.
Visualization: A timeline with alternating CPU/disk activity.
- What function is doing all the synchronous reading, and what files/offsets is
it reading. Visualization: lots of reads across different files out of one
@ -385,6 +399,7 @@ Later:
- Profiling a login session.
- Need to report stat() as well. (Where do inode data end up? In the buffer-cache?)
Also open() may cause disk reads (seeks).
- To generate the timeline we need to know when a disk request is issued and when it
is completed. This way we can assign blame to all applications that have issued a